Thank you, this is awesome. Mig
On Mar 6, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum wrote: > I've finally managed to get this working, without using MuMaMo at > all; see http://nex-3.com/posts/79-highlighting-ruby-in-haml-mode > for details. It's pushed to master. > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum > <[email protected]> wrote: > No, no progress yet. I'll definitely push stuff once I start working > on it. > > The thing about MuMaMo is that, although it is heavy, as far as I > can tell there's nothing as good for doing what we want. > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Mig <[email protected]> wrote: > > Any progress on this? I just started looking into it last night, not > sure if MuMaMo is the best solution, sometimes it can be a little > heavy. If you have done anything towards this, could you throw it on > your github? > > Mig > > On Jan 7, 3:35 pm, topfunky <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 6, 3:26 pm, "Nathan Weizenbaum" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > The suggested way of writing Haml is with a space after the > directive. > > > > Thanks for the clarification. I'll hack on the syntax highlighting > if > > I have time. > > > > Geoffrey Grosenbachhttp://peepcode.com > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
