How are you calling the partial?

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Noel <[email protected]> wrote:

> It prints twice bec the partial is called twice. Once for each symbol.
> There is no concat that I know of.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jul 11, 2009, at 12:56 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> That's even more bizarre. The only thing I can guess is that both Haml and
> ERB are printing the thing twice. Is it possible that something in there is
> calling concat at some point?
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Noel < <[email protected]>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> in erb i get
>>
>> <td>
>>                  tincidunt eu
>>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>>                     StringString
>>                  </span>
>>                </td>
>>
>> in HAML I get
>>
>> <td>
>>                  tincidunt eu
>>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>>                     String
>>                    String
>>                  </span>
>>                </td>
>>
>> Same extra line.
>> String
>> String
>>
>> vs
>>
>> StringString
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 10:46 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum< <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> > If that's what you get, it's not just a string. I don't know what it is
>> if
>> > it produces that sort of inspect output. What happens if you call
>> .class?
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Noel < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> - Yes, removing the h yields the same result
>> >> - Not sure about the haml executable, have to look up how to do that
>> >> - inspect produced this in erb
>> >>
>> >> <td>
>> >>                  tincidunt eu
>> >>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>> >>                    "3""5"
>> >>                  </span>
>> >>                </td>
>> >>
>> >> and this in HAML
>> >>
>> >> <td>
>> >>                  tincidunt eu
>> >>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>> >>                    "3"
>> >>                    "5"
>> >>                  </span>
>> >>                </td>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Nathan Weizenbaum< <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > I honestly have no idea what's going on here. Does it still happen if
>> >> > you
>> >> > remove the #h call? Does it happen from the haml executable? What do
>> you
>> >> > get
>> >> > if you do = h footnote_symbol.symbol.inspect?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Noel < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> oh sorry, symbol is a string
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Erb renders this (as copied from safari web inspector)
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <td>
>> >> >>                  tincidunt eu
>> >> >>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>> >> >>                    35
>> >> >>                  </span>
>> >> >>                </td>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> HAML renders this
>> >> >>
>> >> >> <td>
>> >> >>                  tincidunt eu
>> >> >>                  <span class="footnote_symbols">
>> >> >>                    3
>> >> >>                    5
>> >> >>                  </span>
>> >> >>                </td>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Let me know if you need further clarification.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> -Noel
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:33 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum<<[email protected]>
>> [email protected]>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> > I'm sorry, I'm still not getting it. Is footnote_symbol.symbol a
>> >> >> > string?
>> >> >> > An
>> >> >> > array? What's the actual HTML output of Haml vs. ERB?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Noel < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is an example:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> HAML view has this
>> >> >> >> =h footnote_symbol.symbol
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> which produces this:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> <http://skitch.com/noelgomez/ba821>
>> http://skitch.com/noelgomez/ba821
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> I am talking about the space between the 4 and the 3
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> In the DB the symbols are single characters.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is the same using erb which just prints 43
>> >> >> >> <%=h footnote_symbol.symbol %>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> <http://skitch.com/noelgomez/ba826>
>> http://skitch.com/noelgomez/ba826
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Not sure if I am doing something wrong, but odd that erb does
>> what I
>> >> >> >> expect.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Nathan
>> >> >> >> Weizenbaum< <[email protected]>[email protected]>
>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >> > I'm not entirely sure what you mean. What's the exact Ruby
>> value
>> >> >> >> > of
>> >> >> >> > footnote_symbol.symbol?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Noel < <[email protected]>
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I have a very simple partial
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> = h footnote_symbol.symbol
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I verified the length of symbol to be 1.  My dev data is
>> >> >> >> >> (*,1,2,3,4...)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> when this renders as an example I get
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> 2 5
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> but I was expecting
>> >> >> >> >> 25
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> if I change the partial to erb instead of haml I do get 25.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> I am using haml (2.2.0)
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Any ideas where the extra space is coming from?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> -Noel
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to