Definitely a bug. I'll look into this.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:58 PM, wrs <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> The Haml 2.2.1 :javascript filter is broken with options[:escape_html]
> turned on. If you use a #{} interpolation in the content, the whole
> thing is HTML-escaped. This is unnecessary because the script is in
> CDATA anyway. Well, actually, in 2.2.1 it's escaping the CDATA escape!
>
> Here's a failing unit test for test_escape_html (engine_test.rb). The
> filter test doesn't seem to care about escape_html so this is the
> easiest place to add it...
>
> js_html = <<HTML
> <script type='text/javascript'>
> //<![CDATA[
> & < > &
> //]]>
> </script>
> HTML
>
> assert_equal(js_html, render(<<HAML, :escape_html => true))
> :javascript
> & < > \#{"&"}
> HAML
> end
>
> Result in 2.2.1:
> 1) Failure:
> test_escape_html(EngineTest) [haml/engine_test.rb:430]:
> <"<script type='text/javascript'>\n //<![CDATA[\n & < > &\n //]]>
> \n</script>\n"> expected but was
> <"<script type='text/javascript'>\n //<![CDATA[\n &
> < > &\n //]]>\n</script>\n">.
>
> - Walter
>
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
