You can really only reproduce this with a layout, a template, and three partials, two of which are decided between randomly?
On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 1:43 PM, mpd <[email protected]<pope%[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Jul 26, 11:56 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, mpd > > <[email protected]<pope%[email protected]<pope%[email protected]> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > Yet I do. If I don't use the helper, the logo never changes. I won't > > > pretend > > > I know why. > > > > This is something that warrants some debugging. Add some print statements > to > > check the output of the rand() call or something - poke around. > > You're right about haml not caching. It looks like I may have been the > victim of the RNG choosing the same thing 10+ times in a row when I > first tested that. That's randomness I guess. Sorry for the false > alarm. > > > > > expected/actual outputs > > athttp://gist.github.com/155857(look<http://gist.github.com/155857%28look>for > > the > > > > > form tags) > > > > I meant expected/actual outputs of the minimal test case that still shows > > the problem. It's hard to dig through all the extra markup/Javascript in > > there, and reducing it to the minimal case might help you find the bug. > > > I have stripped the code down to what's at http://gist.github.com/155909 > > At this point the code that generates this is small enough to look at, > so that's at http://gist.github.com/155911 > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
