On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Norman Clarke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Also the way Haml is now, if you don't want the tag you can just add a > conditional. The feature that's being described would leave you with > no way to always get the tag if that's what you want, unless a config > option is added. If you wanted to force the tag to show even when your content was nil, you could pretty easily do: %li= nil.to_s I've got no real opinion on which behavior makes more sense, but the "don't show tags with nil content" behavior is easy to override, case-by-case. Cheers, -Nate --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
