Every time I realize I need something, there you are building it.
Thanks!
-e


On Jan 26, 4:17 pm, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote:
> I've just pushed rgba(color, alpha) syntax to master.
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Damn, Nathan beat me to a reply. I had said basically the same in my draft.
>
> > Additionally, I added:
>
> > I'm sure the w3c folks thought about an extended syntax as well and decided
> > against it. it'd be interesting to dig up the minutes and/or mailing list
> > posts on the topic. Extending the hex sequence to add another one or two
> > bits of data seems the most obvious to me and I'd like to know why they
> > decided against it.
>
> > AND
>
> > The distinction between syntax and function is arbitrary and is merely
> > based on a decision about whether the parser should construct an object or
> > should construction an object that constructs an object. Also, we're
> > removing the delineation between script mode and css mode in 2.4 so the
> > syntax for these kind of functions is universal.
>
> > Chris
>
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Mislav Marohnić <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 18:21, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >>> If we want to extend the hex syntax, the extension should be in hex not
> >>> some other value:
>
> >>> #fff7 and #c0c0a07f
>
> >>> Thus, the alpha layer is broken into 256 discrete values between 0 and 1.
>
> >> Ugh... That came to my mind, but I quickly discarded it. When it comes to
> >> opacity, I think we all think in percentages. Anyway, there's no reason why
> >> a value couldn't be a vector of two different number systems: complex
> >> numbers are real on one axis and imaginary on the other. So a color value
> >> could have a triple hex number as color dimension and a decimal number for
> >> opacity.
>
> >> OK, so the dot syntax seems awkward in this case:
>
> >>     #fff.5
>
> >> But alternate syntaxes are possible:
>
> >>     #fff^50%
> >>     #...@50%
> >>     #fff~50%
> >>     #fff{.5}
> >>     #fff[.5]
>
> >> Food for thought.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "Haml" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
>
> >  --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Haml" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.

Reply via email to