If I indent, then it would be the endif after, but it would use the downlevel hidden syntax.
I was asking for a way to do downlevel revealed comments, but the method I suggested didn't seem to work on every version of IE 7 anyway, so I ended up finding a different way to include the syntactically invalid downlevel revealed syntax by using :erb :erb <![if gt IE 7]> #do something that will work in firefox as well :erb <![endif]> Thanks, Michael On Jan 27, 7:58 pm, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]> wrote: > You need to indent underneath your conditional comment. > > Chris > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 12:34 PM, michaelorr <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > I've got a project that I'm working on and I've found a place where I > > really need to be able to use downlevel revealed conditional > > comments. Haml only seems to support downlevel hidden conditional > > comments. I found some discussion about a year and half ago on this > > issue and the consensus seemed to be that because downlevel hidden > > conditional comments as suggested by microsoft are not valid HTML > > comments. > > > I discovered this link: > >http://www.456bereastreet.com/archive/200511/valid_downlevelrevealed_... > > which shows how to do syntactically valid downlevel revealed > > conditional comments. > > > <!--[if gt IE 7]>--> > > <div id='do'>something that will work in firefox as well</div> > > <!--<![endif]--> > > > Could we find a way to incorporate this into haml? Is there already > > some way to do this that I have missed? Is there any way to pass a > > string after the / specifying an HTML comment and not have it be > > interpreted as a conditional comment. This way I could use two > > comment lines to wrap the code like this: > > > /[if gt IE 7]> > > #do something that will work in firefox as well > > /<![endif] > > > which i would hope would produce the above output but instead produces > > > <!--[if gt IE 7]> > <![endif]--> > > <div id='do'>something that will work in firefox as well</div> > > <!-- <![endif] --> > > > because it is parsing it as a conditional comment instead of a regular > > comment, even though I have added the additional ">" character to the > > end of my first comment. > > > Thanks, > > Michael > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Haml" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
