On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > The problem is not so much that the specific indentation has been hard-coded > (it has in a few places for reasons of simplicity, but not enough that they > would be terribly difficult to change). The bigger problem is that there are > numerous places where indentation is important for more than generation: > re-indenting code that's already indented, for instance. This is the stuff > that would be difficult to track down and get exactly right, especially with > an arbitrary string as indentation.
Thank you for explaining Nathan. Thats good to know. So its all these surrounding features which affect / are affected by and expecting the fixed 2spc haml indentation level. Perfectly understandable. Expect me to stay away from this until I feel confident enough about those feature set. Unfortunately this is a bit beyond me just at the moment. So, for later then. :) >> dreamcat4 >> [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
