On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Glenn Rempe <[email protected]> wrote: Glenn,
> And why is it that every few months there is some controversial blowup > on some open source project mailing list that you seem to be the root > instigator of? Here's an example. Sound familiar? > > Yes, I am a troll, a douche, lazy person who only bitches about HAML and never contributed to it. This does not change one fact — that HAML, being a complex piece of code that is hard to fix in 30 minutes on your own, supports all possible versions of all possible web frameworks on a single branch and pushes compatibility changes on people who upgrade to point (supposedly bug fix only) releases — any less true. Not ignoring this fact is quite likely to make trolls like me appear here less frequently. > And what exactly does "virtually monkey-patching free" mean in your > world of ultimate stability and perfect release management? > > What that meant to say is apps in question do not practice monkey patching of HAML, ActionView or any other rendering code. Some apps are inherently difficult to upgrade because engineers who built them practice extensive monkey patching. This was not the case. -- MK -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
