That's correct. Barring manual insertion of HTML via plain text or code, a Haml document will always produce well-formed HTML.
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Mark Wotton <[email protected]> wrote: > I've been thinking about the structure of Haml lately, and it occurred > to me that it's possible that you can't actually generate incorrectly > nested HTML with Haml, which to my mind would be a significant > advantage over ERB. Modulo actually including HTML fragments (in which > case obviously all bets are off), is there a case that I've missed? > > Cheers > Mark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
