FWIW, an attribute like autofocus="autofocus" is perfectly valid HTML 5. It's slightly more verbose than necessary, but it shouldn't throw any validation errors. I don't think it's even set for deprecation.
:brad On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Mislav Marohnić <[email protected]>wrote: > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 07:28, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Form helpers are a completely separate thing from Haml tags. They're >> provided by Rails and don't make any use of the Haml tag-rendering >> infrastructure. So it's not that surprising that they don't support boolean >> attributes. > > > Also, it's worth noting that Rails 2.3 tag helpers always generate XHTML. I > monkeypatched this in my Standardista plugin: > > http://github.com/mislav/standardista/blob/master/lib/standardista/rails_override.rb > > > <http://github.com/mislav/standardista/blob/master/lib/standardista/rails_override.rb>I > believe they handle some boolean tags like "checked" or "disabled", but it's > a small whitelist and definitely doesn't support HTML5. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > -- Bradley Grzesiak co-founder, bendyworks llc http://bendyworks.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
