Yehuda tells me that Rails 3 is switching to using HTML5 as the default, so Haml might make that change as well.
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]>wrote: > Mostly because Rails does it the same way. All of Rails' HTML-generation > code generates XHTML, and it's important for Haml to be compatible with > that. > > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Sonja Elen Kisa <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I was reading the essay below on why HTML 4.01 Strict is better than >> XHTML, and it got me thinking... why is XHTML the default in HAML and >> not HTML 4.01 Strict? >> >> http://www.webdevout.net/articles/beware-of-xhtml >> >> Sonja >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Haml" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. >> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
