I think it's actually a problem with Rails, which is fixed in Rails 3. Anyway, why keep them around? That's what source control is for! And if you don't know how to use your source control tool that well, now's a great time to learn.
:brad Bradley Grzesiak co-founder, bendyworks llc On Jun 18, 2010, at 12:10 PM, newellista <[email protected]> wrote: > I have a mixed HTML/HAML rails site. In a few cases, we have > converted the erb files to haml, but have left the erb file in the > directory. In development, the .haml files always render, but in > production, it appears that the .erb files render instead. > > I realize I can (and should) remove the offending .erb files, but this > behavior seems to indicate a problem with the haml system. > > Is this working as designed and I am confused? Or should the .haml > files always be rendered, if available? > > Thanks, > > Steve > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
