No, we intend to continue supporting it indefinitely. On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Richard Aday <[email protected]>wrote:
> Is that going to be deprecated soon? > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> > wrote: > > ":prop name" is an older (but still valid) syntax for "prop: name". > > > > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:34 AM, DAZ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Thanks Nathan, > >> > >> I appreciate that start-of-line syntax must make things very > >> complicated, so it is probably not worth doing. You're right, it's not > >> a huge imposition to have to type out @extend. > >> > >> If it is possible though, I don't think you should worry about Sass > >> becoming a mess of symbols. People will not have to memorise them > >> because of the newer, alternative syntax, but people who prefer to > >> keep things short can use the shortcut symbols if they wish. > >> > >> cheers, > >> > >> DAZ > >> ps - what does : at the beginning of a line do? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Aug 16, 9:58 am, Nathan Weizenbaum <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Any additional start-of-line syntax runs the strong risk of being > >> > ambiguous > >> > in the indented syntax. We already feel the pain of this with : and +; > >> > I'd > >> > rather not add more such syntax unless it seems clearly necessary. I > >> > don't > >> > think typing out @extend is egregious enough to warrant it. > >> > > >> > I'd also be somewhat worried about Sass becoming a mess of symbols > that > >> > all > >> > had to be memorized. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:18 PM, DAZ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > Thanks for the reply Chris, > >> > > >> > > That's good to know that + will be kept in. I started using scss, > but > >> > > actually prefer the shorter syntax of sass. > >> > > >> > > How about using < to indicate @extends? This would be similar to > Ruby > >> > > class inheritance. > >> > > So for example: > >> > > >> > > .error > >> > > color: red > >> > > >> > > .bigerror > >> > > < error > >> > > >> > > Does this get in the way of child selectors? If so, how about the > >> > > double-angle bracket <<, a bit like appending in Ruby? > >> > > >> > > .bigerror > >> > > << error > >> > > >> > > Thanks again, > >> > > >> > > DAZ > >> > > >> > > On Aug 15, 5:59 pm, Chris Eppstein <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > @mixin and @include were introduced for scss to avoid introducing > >> > > > new > >> > > > parsing rules into that syntax. We support the original/shortcut > >> > > > syntax > >> > > in > >> > > > sass files for consistency and do not plan to deprecate them > unless > >> > > > there > >> > > > are changes to the CSS specification require it. > >> > > >> > > > The examples we use on the website are as similar as possible to > >> > > > help > >> > > people > >> > > > understand easier -- not because of any personal preferences on > our > >> > > > part. > >> > > >> > > > As far as @extend goes, we briefly discussed introducing a new > >> > > > shortcut > >> > > > syntax for it decided to start simple and keep things the same. > CSS > >> > > > is > >> > > such > >> > > > a verbose syntax anyway so it didn't seem egregious. I'm not > opposed > >> > > > to a > >> > > > shortcut syntax for @extend in sass files, but I can't think of > one > >> > > > that > >> > > > works well with all the simple selectors extend supports and > doesn't > >> > > > introduce parsing issues. Did you have something in mind? > >> > > >> > > > On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 8:47 AM, DAZ <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > > Hi, > >> > > >> > > > > I've only just started playing around with SASS and realised > that > >> > > > > you > >> > > > > can use + as a shortcut for @include, but this isn't used in any > >> > > > > of > >> > > > > the examles on the SASS homepage (http://sass-lang.com/), is it > >> > > > > going > >> > > > > to be deprecated in favour of using @include? > >> > > >> > > > > Also, is there a similar shortcut symbol for @extend? > >> > > >> > > > > cheers, > >> > > >> > > > > DAZ > >> > > >> > > > > -- > >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > >> > > Groups > >> > > > > "Haml" group. > >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > <haml%[email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > >< > >> > > > >> > > haml%[email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > <haml%[email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > > > >> > > >. > >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at > >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > >> > > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > > Groups > >> > > "Haml" group. > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > [email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > >> > > <haml%[email protected]<haml%[email protected]> > >. > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Haml" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> [email protected] <haml%[email protected]> > . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Haml" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > -Richard Aday > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Haml" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <haml%[email protected]>. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Haml" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
