Excerpts from Ken Collins's message of Mon Mar 28 21:55:32 +0200 2011:
> > I just wrote one: haml-to-php.com. However its proprietary code.
> > See related work section on that page. Compatibility is really good.
>
> I am curious, why not open source?
Because
a) Ruby is better anyway
(See link on related work. I tell everybody about it)
It has
- more libraries
- better libraries (see related work sections: Many haml
implementations can be found - but no one is usable.
PHP devs don't seem to know about test cases !?
)
- blocks yielding less code
- try finally like
- ...
b) I have to feed myself
I'm sorry - I don't think that donations work pretty well.
If they did gimp would be more advanced and more photoshop like
(talking about its features)
I'm a friend of open source and I'll always be one. See my github page
github.com/MarcWeber
I only wrote this library for brave soles who can't switch language for
whatever reason.
If other projects I want to start take off I may change license to open
source later.
Marc Weber
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Haml" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected].
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/haml?hl=en.
