Not sure if I got the url right via mobile phone but there's a post from an ex-canonical emoyee about this: https://plus.google.com/app/basic/stream/z132szwbruiozdntp22iiziggr24tzlwg04?cbp=104mhlwf5d4ys&spath=/app/basic/109365858706205035322/posts&sparm=cbp%3Dix7bz3mtvnnl%26force%3D1%26partnerid%3Dt1&force=1&partnerid=t1
Anton -- Anton Piatek (sent from my phone, please excuse any typos) http://www.strangeparty.com No trees were destroyed in the sending of this message, however, a significant number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced. On 11 Dec 2012 17:53, "Lisi" <hants...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 11 December 2012 17:40:25 Gordon Scott wrote: > > When I first read that I thought it was just Richard Stallman going off > > on one of his "software must be free or die" rants, but I followed some > > of the links and there seems to be a number of people who are convinced > > it's true. Of course one has to be cautious of things one reads in the > > media and especially on the 'Net. > > I had already heard about it, and I am pretty sure that it is true. Some > people feel that Canonical is justified. And I don't like Ubuntu anyway! > > Lisi > > -- > Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk > Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire > LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk > -------------------------------------------------------------- >
-- Please post to: Hampshire@mailman.lug.org.uk Web Interface: https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/hampshire LUG URL: http://www.hantslug.org.uk --------------------------------------------------------------
