2008/4/17 Nguyen Vu Hung <vuhung16plus+shape at gmail.com>: > B?c ch? c? th? xem s? "kh?ng ho?n h?o" ?? l? g?? > > Em c? ??c qua ph?n "Risk factor" v? "Conclusion" trong ?? nh?ng t?c gi? ch? > ??a ra nh?ng ?i?m m?nh c?a open format m? th?i.
Trong ph?n "Risk factor" t?c gi? c? vi?t: """ The GIMP is a particularly egregious example. Its default .xcf format can only be read by GIMP and is deliberately undocumented outside the source code. GIMP only exports to formats with massive fidelity loss (you can export the final result but not in any editable form that includes layers and effects and brushes and so on). There are only a handful of third-party converters, and none of them are anywhere near complete. This is no better than Microsoft Office; in fact, it's probably worse. In practice, Microsoft Office documents have better interoperability, because third parties have spent more time reverse-engineering the formats and handling all the edge cases. (Third parties are working on reverse-engineering XCF too.) """ PS: Em c?n ?t tu?i h?n anh.
