Hi Hưng, On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung <[email protected]>wrote:
> FYI, > > Ubuntu 11.04 replaces OpenOffice.org by LibreOffice (will be LibO 3.3, I > guess) > > https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2011-January/032298.html > Cũng vừa dịch tin về việc này xong trong chiều nay: http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Ubuntu-11-04-to-include-LibreOffice-1163776.html > nhưng chắc phải thứ 2 tuần sau mới post lên blog. > nghialt > Hi, > > had to cancel my skiing vacation because of an injury, and had a look at > the > current OOo/LO situation for 11.04 instead. The OOo packaging is only > available > for version 3.2.1, there doesn't exist any packaging for 3.3 based on our > ooo-build packaging. ooo-build is now used in LO, and the packaging is > converted to use LO. The uno framework is one of the basic things which is > shared with the OOo packaging, and I don't see any easy way how to make the > two > uno frameworks from both source packages available. The consequence is that > the > old OOo packages are removed/replaced with the installation of the LO > packages. > As long as we want to update to *O 3.3 there currently is no other > way than to > go with LO. > > The OOo packaging did accumulate a lot of changes, hacks and workarounds, > which > I didn't apply to the LO packaging, plus some Ubuntu specific changes are > not > yet ported to LO 3.3. As long as there is no libreoffice package in > Ubuntu, > these issues are tracked in [1]. If you report new issues, please tag > these > issues with `lo33'. > > Test packages including backports for lucid and maverick can be found at > > > https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ppa/+packages<https://launchpad.net/%7Elibreoffice/+archive/ppa/+packages> > > Note that a reinstallation of the old OOo packages is not automatic > and requires > manual removal of all LO packages before trying the reinstallation. > > The packages definitely need some testing, but else they look ok-ish for > inclusion in natty for alpha-2. See the list of issues, and maybe target > some > of these for alpha-2 or alpha-3. The most important thing seems to be the > KDE > build and maybe the ARM build (although it's not yet found anymore on the > ARM > images). > > Matthias > > [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=lo33 > > > -- > Best Regards, > Nguyen Hung Vu [aka: NVH] ( in Vietnamese: Nguyễn Vũ Hưng ) > vuhung16plus{[email protected]<vuhung16plus%[email protected]>, > YIM: vuhung16 , Skype: vuhung16plus > _______________________________________________ > POST RULES : http://wiki.hanoilug.org/hanoilug:mailing_list_guidelines > _______________________________________________ > HanoiLUG mailing lists: http://lists.hanoilug.org/ > HanoiLUG wiki: http://wiki.hanoilug.org/ > HanoiLUG blog: http://blog.hanoilug.org/
_______________________________________________ POST RULES : http://wiki.hanoilug.org/hanoilug:mailing_list_guidelines _______________________________________________ HanoiLUG mailing lists: http://lists.hanoilug.org/ HanoiLUG wiki: http://wiki.hanoilug.org/ HanoiLUG blog: http://blog.hanoilug.org/
