btw, is there some tool to test at least RFC 7230 compliance ? also, there are various specific implementation like MAPI / MS RPC which might require some testing tool as well
inspired by h2spec actually. can/should we add some HTTP/1.1 tests as well ? ср, 25 мар. 2020 г. в 11:02, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: > Hi guys, > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 01:42:14AM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > (...) > > > Hope you have an idea where to look. Providing captures/logs is a bit > > > difficult without some careful scrubbing.. > > I think a good test would be to just revert that patch, or selectively > each one of the 3 lines it contains. > > > No answer yet, but I just tried to do a checkout of the FreeBSD svn tree > > via haproxy, and it indeed doesn't work, it's a bit late right now, but > > I'll have a look tomorrow :) > > OK thanks. I remember that you had some opinions on some of them at some > point. However I'm tempted to think that if any of them needs to be > changed, > we're probably missing something somewhere which could indicate that other > subscribes might randomly fail, because each time it's in h1_detach() and > I don't see why we should always wake up if already subscribed. > > Thanks, > Willy > >
