thanks for taking a look willy. let me know if there's anything else i
should change.
global
maxconn 4096
user haproxy
group haproxy
daemon
log 127.0.0.1 local0 notice
# http
defaults
log global
retries 3
timeout connect 5000
timeout client 600000
timeout server 600000
stats enable
stats auth ggard:buddycat
mode http
option httplog
balance roundrobin
# option httpclose
option httpchk HEAD /check.txt HTTP/1.0
#stable sites run win2k/iis5/asp
listen stable 192.168.1.5:10301
option forwardfor
server stable1 192.168.1.10:10300 weight 4 check
server stable2 192.168.1.11:10300 weight 6 check
# beta sites running mongrel/rails2.2.2
listen beta 192.168.1.5:8089
server 7-8091 192.168.1.22:8091 weight 4 maxconn 1 check
server 7-8092 192.168.1.22:8092 weight 4 maxconn 1 check
server 7-8093 192.168.1.22:8093 weight 4 maxconn 1 check
server 7-8094 192.168.1.22:8094 weight 4 maxconn 1 check
server 7-8095 192.168.1.22:8095 weight 4 maxconn 1 check
server 3-8091 192.168.1.23:8091 weight 6 maxconn 1 check
server 3-8092 192.168.1.23:8092 weight 6 maxconn 1 check
server 3-8093 192.168.1.23:8093 weight 6 maxconn 1 check
server 3-8094 192.168.1.23:8094 weight 6 maxconn 1 check
server 3-8095 192.168.1.23:8095 weight 6 maxconn 1 check
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 03:54:13PM -0500, Greg Gard wrote:
> > hi willy and all,
> >
> > wondering if i can expect haproxy to queue requests when max conn per
> > backend it set to 1. running nginx > haproxy > mongrel/rails2.2.2.
>
> yes, it works fine and is even the recommended way of setting it for
> use with mongrel. There have been trouble in the past with some old
> versions, where a request could starve in the queue for too long.
> What version are you using ?
>
> > all seems ok, but i am getting a few users complaining of connection
> > problems and never see anything other than zeros in the
> > queue columns.
>
> Have you correctly set the "maxconn" on the "server" lines ? I suspect
> you have changed it in the frontend instead, which would be a disaster.
> Could you please post your configuration ?
>
> Regards,
> Willy
>
>
--
greg gard, psyd
www.carepaths.com
