On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2009-04-22, Jeffrey 'jf' Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> A clear error on start up and description of how to resolve would be
>>> useful I guess, but then I guess haproxy wouldn't know it was being
>>> blocked by selinux policy?
>>
>> nope... Unless there were some kind of a "standard" way to inform an
>> application (in which case, of course, the app would have to be
>> programmed for that).
>
> Yes, I think it's supposed to be up to the OS to notify the admin here
> via logs, popups or email.. I always have a
>
> tail -f /var/log/audit/auditd.log|grep avc
>
> running when I install new services.. Then I immediately see if
> something is denied.
>
ok. So no protocol then.
>
>> -jf (too, ha)
>
> I was considering if two "-jf"'s might be too much, and if I should
> find another ha-proxying solution since you were here first :-)
>
>
oh come on - you shouldnt have to do that... Like where would you go
to find as good a load balancer as haproxy? ;)
-jf
--
In the meantime, here is your PSA:
"It's so hard to write a graphics driver that open-sourcing it would not help."
-- Andrew Fear, Software Product Manager, NVIDIA Corporation
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7228
