Hi, On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 06:36:06PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote: (...) > Hervé's patch is near the lightest check haproxy can do, the > "haproxy" user can be provided in the authentication request > (or not) and I'd prefer the response to be ignored as it can > have side effect on the backend server stability (going up > and down depending on the number of packets received), this > happened to me during all my tests. Maybe the documentation > can be updated to make the "haproxy" insert optional, and > needed only for users who don't want to see the "Aborted_connects" > counter increase due to health-checks.
Does this mean that the anonymous empty user will not log aborted connects either ? If so, we should probably stick to that instead of suggesting creation of a specific haproxy user on the server, no ? > > Hoping this helps you figure how to arrange this test. If you want we > > can discuss that on monday. > > I also hope this won't take you too much time ;) we'll try to be short. Herve will tell me how mysql works and I will try to figure what haproxy currently lacks to help him do the tests he wants :-) Willy
