I forgot to mention that yes this is a dedicated machine.
On 6 February 2010 12:47, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 12:27:10PM +0100, Peter Griffin wrote: > > The minute I put the changes and made the loadbalancer active, external > > users experienced serious downtime. I tried accessing our site from an > > external source and sure enough we were unbrowsable. So I had to take > > haproxy off again. Ram was now stable at 750Mb free. > > > > At the time I had about 300 connections and only 10% were https. > > was it unbrowsable on HTTP too, or just HTTPS ? > > > At this point, could it be a defective nic? Wrong kernel? I'm running > > Fedora 12. > > Very unlikely. Hmm would this haproxy run on a dedicated machine ? > If so, can you check its connectivity ? At least run "ethtool eth0" and > check that your link is correctly detected as full duplex. If you could > try a file transfer in each direction to confirm that you can saturate > the link, it'll be nice. > > If the machine is dedicated, it's possible that you have iptables loaded > too and that it quickly fills its conntrack table. You'd see that in > "dmesg". > > Willy > >
dmesg.rar
Description: Binary data
