On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:49:31AM -0400, Timothy Garnett wrote: > Thanks, > > We're working on reducing the lengths of the urls on pages in question > (another issue is the IE has trouble with urls longer then ~2k) since it was > unexpected, but wanted to track down where in our stack the liming factor > was and what the limit was for future reference. We also use haproxy > internally as a load balancer on some backend services which can generate > very long urls and we wanted to be sure we wouldn't run into issues there.
if you have some fears about very long URLs, then I really recommend you to upgrade to 1.4 where it's easier to change the default length. > Thanks for all the help and the great product! you're welcome :-) Willy
