Awesome, thanks Willy. I look forward to testing it out. -Joe
On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:04 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Joe, > > On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 07:37:20AM -0700, Joe Williams wrote: > (...) >>> Thus we could have : >>> >>> timeout server 5m >>> timeout dead-server 10s >>> >>> I'm not saying it would be easier (it would not in my opinion), but it would >>> provide much cleaner results. What do you think ? >> >> >> >> Willy, >> >> I think that should work, my issue is definitely long polling requests as >> you suggested. The only thing in addition to this would be to retry the >> request but failing faster might be good enough for now. As I mentioned in >> my second email doing ACL based timeouts would also work for me since I know >> which urls I expect to take a long time to return. > > OK. Concerning the ACL-based timeouts, I have added that to the 1.5 roadmap, > because I think that it's not too hard to do if we only support changing the > server timeout (others are useless in this case). > > Cheers, > Willy > > Name: Joseph A. Williams Email: [email protected] Blog: http://www.joeandmotorboat.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/williamsjoe
