On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:39:29PM -0400, Walck, Christopher wrote: > Willy and Gabor, > > Thanks for the follow-up. In this instance, #1 can be implemented. > > However, I can imagine an environment where #2 would need to be supported.
OK so it's less urgent and might wait for some thinking first in order to make it more generic if needed. Thanks, Willy
