On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 04:39:27PM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote: > I really like the idea and it could be a great improvement for haproxy. > The advantage of this solution is also that it doesn't add another keyword in > the long list of possibilities haproxy offers.
Indeed, that's also another point. And it's one less parameter admins will have to be taught. > Also, what I see in this feature is that it will immediatly fix > configurations > where timeouts are forgotten (I can't say how many times I've seen instances > that didn't set the http-keep-alive timeout, where it's easy to create a DoS). I didn't think about this, but you're perfectly right ! > > If you're interested in doing this, I'd be glad to merge it and to > > provide help if needed. We need a "struct list fe_idle" in the struct > > proxy and add/remove idle connections there. > > Of course I'm interested. I can't promise I'll be available for it for the > next days but I can start it shortly. Nice, thank you! Don't forget to take a rest, you're on holidays ;-) Cheers, Willy
