Hi, On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 02:48:52PM +0200, Graeme Donaldson wrote: > On 9 September 2011 14:44, John Helliwell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Indeed, the httchk is expecting a HTTP response header. I think I can fool > > it by installing a wrapper script on the target which inserts a valid HTTP > > response header - there is an example of that at > > http://sysbible.org/2008/12/04/having-haproxy-check-mysql-status-through-a-xinetd-script/ > > That could work. > > In case someone stumbles across this in the archives, it's worth > mentioning that a mysql-specific health check does exist in the > current versions of HAproxy and the hack described in the above URL is > no longer needed *for mysql*. Nevertheless, the principle described > could be used for your redis checks.
Redis checks were included a few weeks ago in the development version. I'm planning to release 1.5-dev7 this evening or this week-end, so you'll have it. If you can't wait, you can also retrieve the latest 1.5 snapshot. Regards, Willy
