Hi Carlo,
On Mar 15, 2012, at 9:04 AM, Carlo Flores wrote: > Hey Michele. > > I'm confused as to how "show stat" is correct... > > >According to the statistics I have retrieved by means of "show stat" after > >enabling disabling servers, it looks like the socket is working as expected. > > But your script does not correspond to this even though it uses "show stat"... I have changed the script. If you wish to see it, I can send it to you. > > >After executing the code above, I use a different socket to retrieve the > >stats and check that the number of active servers corresponds to the > >expected one. > > You're sure it's not an issue with this script and the autoheal you have > going on to see the number of expected servers? No, I have tried with hatop as well, and the same problem occurs. > > If you stop that script and simply disable a server via socat, then refresh > the interface as well as get a new show stat, then enable a server via socat, > then refresh the interface as well as get a new show stat, are your results > as expected? > I don't think it's a problem related to the web interface -- socat behaves like my script, i.e., it fails to enable servers from time to time. Cheers, Michele > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michele, > > On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 01:07:51PM +0200, Michele Mazzucco wrote: > > Hello Willy, > > > > I have tried to follow your advice, but it didn't solve the matter -- it > > looks like the problem is not the web interface. > > After executing the code above, I use a different socket to retrieve the > > stats and check that the number of active servers corresponds to the > > expected > > one. > > This is the log > > > > > > 2012-03-14 10:50:56,568 Enabling reserves > > 2012-03-14 10:50:56,568 enable server www/i-932dbef7 > > <-- command sent over the socket > > 2012-03-14 10:50:56,569 Expected 5 active serves, have 4, calling > > change_state() again > > 2012-03-14 10:50:56,569 enable server www/i-932dbef7 > > <--- command sent over the socket > > ... server enabled > > Just to be sure, is it the disabling of servers which causes trouble or > enabling them back ? > > I'm asking because we (very) recently fixed an issues related to servers > leaving maintenance mode which was introduced by fixing another issue with > server tracking, but the regression did not affect any 1.4 releases. > However, since both fixes have been backported into 1.4.20, it is possible > there was another corner case we did not identify and which is solved now. > > Just in case, would you please check if 1.4.20 still behaves the same ? > Maybe we're trying to troubleshoot an already fixed issue. > > Regards, > Willy > > >
