Hi Sander,

On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Sander Klein wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
> 
> On 02.04.2013 21:02, Thomas Heil wrote:
> >Of course, it matters. As you explained the problem should be arround
> >patch 86  up to 101. How does you haproxy -vv
> >look like? Do you use compression or SSL? Could you eliminate Patch
> >91,92 and 98?
> 
> haproxy -vv looks like:
> 
> sander@lb01-a:~$ /usr/sbin/haproxy -vv
> HA-Proxy version 1.5-dev17 2012/12/28
> Copyright 2000-2012 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
> 
> Build options :
>   TARGET  = linux26
>   CPU     = generic
>   CC      = gcc
>   CFLAGS  = -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing
>   OPTIONS = USE_LINUX_SPLICE=1 USE_LINUX_TPROXY=1 USE_LIBCRYPT=1 
> USE_GETADDRINFO=1 USE_ZLIB=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_PCRE=1
> 
> Default settings :
>   maxconn = 2000, bufsize = 16384, maxrewrite = 8192, maxpollevents = 
> 200
> 
> Encrypted password support via crypt(3): yes
> Built with zlib version : 1.2.3.4
> Compression algorithms supported : identity, deflate, gzip
> Built with OpenSSL version : OpenSSL 0.9.8o 01 Jun 2010
> OpenSSL library supports TLS extensions : yes
> OpenSSL library supports SNI : yes
> OpenSSL library supports prefer-server-ciphers : yes
> 
> Available polling systems :
>       epoll : pref=300,  test result OK
>        poll : pref=200,  test result OK
>      select : pref=150,  test result OK
> Total: 3 (3 usable), will use epoll.
> 
> I do not use SSL or compression in my current config. I was actually 
> upgrading to the latest snapshot to start using SSL :-)
> 
> I've recompiled without path 91,92 and 98 but I still see the same 
> problem. The websites on the new cluster (nginx) don't load, or 
> partially load. And, the sites on the old cluster (apache) behave 
> normally.
> 
> I'm not sure, but it almost looks like the timing issue I had with 
> POST's back in the early dev17 days. Although I'm doing a simple get 
> right now.

Sounds like I broke the response forward state machine last evening
then (the last 3 patches that went into 20130402), because all other
patches are just cosmetic. I'm re-auditing the code now.

Thanks,
Willy


Reply via email to