On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:21:24PM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > Hi Geoff! > > > I've told them to ensure the weight is '1' on all servers that > > should be serving content, but as we all know something like > > that can be missed pretty easily > > Agreed. > > > > I'm not sure if this is duplicating functionality that wasn't > > functional or not, but here are the changes I've made to the > > latest snapshot to support the functionality I was requesting. > > I believe the mailer damaged the diff. I manually applied your > changes with some slight modifications (renaming the class name > from maintain2 to softstop and removed "(MAINT)") and I like it. > > Attaching the patch for further review.
Makes sense, especially since what commonly happens is the following scenario : - soft stop - wait - disable - operate - enable and go to bed But the server keeps its 0 weight and does not take any traffic. I have applied your patch and I like it as well. Thanks! Willy
