On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:40:46PM -0700, Bryan Talbot wrote: > So it looks like there's no way to properly support socket.io currently > with haproxy without hacking the client. I've been doing that (duplicate > the token in the query string or header) during testing but don't want to > do it generally since I'm not always in control of client code.
We've just been doing source-ip based load balancing, which seems to work fine for our socket.io stuff... Would that not work for you? - brandon
