Now that I'm seeing the patch in its context, I think it's not the cleanest way to do it, because we redefine IPV6_TRANSPARENT and IP_TRANSPARENT when IP_FREEBIND is not defined, while we don't use this one and the other ones are defined below. Also I'm concerned about the result of running this with an unsupported kernel, which will fail the IP_TRANSPARENT syscall and fall back to IP_FREEBIND, arbitrarily forced to 15 (since it's for Linux) and which I don't know what it means on FreeBSD.
So I'm thinking again about having a separate USE_FREEBSD_TPROXY option, I'll see what I can come up with. Regards, Willy
