Hi Everyone, apologies for not replying sooner, I had my filtering a bit too overbearing and didn't notice the replies.
In answer to your question, no actually I had never noticed any crashes of haproxy before build19. Unfortunately I just experienced a crash using the git checkout, it was the first since posting here. So, if it's useful at all, the debug log I collected using the previous command is available here: https://silverbucket.net/haproxy_debug3.log.gz I've just recompiled haproxy using the following command: # make DEBUG=-DDEBUG_FULL CFLAGS="-g -O0" TARGET=linux2628 CPU=native USE_PCRE=1 USE_OPENSSL=1 USE_ZLIB=1 Adjusted ulimit, but cannot set `suid_dumpable` # echo 2 > /proc/sys/fs/suid_dumpable bash: echo: write error: Operation not permitted Nor can I set the core dump pattern: # echo "/tmp/core-%e-%s-%u-%g-%p-%t" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern bash: echo: write error: Operation not permitted (running as root) Anyway, I'm running the haproxy that's been compiled with the debug flags now... Cheers Nick On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 1:17 AM, amyas <am...@yasmolive.com> wrote: > Willy Tarreau <w <at> 1wt.eu> writes: > > > +---------------------------------+ > > | | > > | HAPROXY MUST NEVER EVER CRASH | > > | | > > +---------------------------------+ > > I know you have said that in the past, but I don't know if people are used > to > packages with that level of commitment. > Might it be worth adding that to the README file in the "how to report > bugs" > section as you mention on the homepage? > > Also, is it close to time for a new dev release? There is more than a page > or so > of improvements since the last one. > > Thanks as always. > > >