Hi Baptiste, thank you for having a look at this. Is my scenario so uncommon?
Regarding my "feature request": Do you think it would be resible to have a kind of server grouping or a bundling named "pyhiscal server"? Best regards Andreas Mock -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Baptiste [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Montag, 2. September 2013 21:47 An: Andreas Mock Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Limits for physical server Hi Andreas, My last question was more related to how within HAProxy, you decided to forward one request to a particular backend. What criteria are you using? Anyway, your numbers are huge and so no simple workarounds may apply. And unfortunately, the maxconn server parameter can't be changed using HAProxy socket. I'm sorry I can't help here. Baptiste On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Andreas Mock <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Baptiste, > > the answers to your questions: > > 1) No persistence needed. http(s)-Proxy (1.5.x) > 2) 6 + x physical servers, 97 frontend services > (IP-Port-Combinations), and almost any frontend service can be served > by a service on the physical server. > 3) currently round robin. Open for other advice. > > Best regards > Andreas Mock > > P.S.: Would a logical grouping of servers (in terms of HA) to server > groups with the ability to have config variables for server groups a > meaningful feature request? > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Baptiste [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Montag, 2. September 2013 11:50 > An: Andreas Mock > Cc: [email protected] > Betreff: Re: Limits for physical server > > Hi, > > This is not easily doable out of the box, but some workarounds may be doable. > Please let me know the few information below: > - Do you need persistence? > - how many servers? > - how many backends? > - how do you take routing decision between backends > > Baptiste > > > On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Mock <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I'm not sure if the following is doable: >> >> I have several servers (processes providing services) on one physical >> server. Is there a way to limit the count of connections for the >> physical server? >> >> backend num1 >> server1 IP:Port1 >> server2 IP:Port1 >> backend num2 >> server1 IP:Port2 >> server2 IP:Port2 >> >> And I want to limit resources based on the entities server1, server2 >> while sharing their resources among the backends. >> >> Hint appreciated. >> >> Best regards >> Andreas Mock >> >> >
