Hi folks,

> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:05:24 +0100
> Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Mark-Antoine,
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 07:37:21PM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
>>> I don't have access to a computer to actually test those, but:
>>> - the first one looks nice, never felt really confident hard coding
>>> SBINDIR and the solution makes sense
>>> - nice catch for the second one, didn't think of the sigint when
>>> writing it, lgtm
>>> - third one is trivial enough not to harm anyone
>>>
>>> +1 for me
>>
>> OK that's perfect, I'm merging them.
>>
>> Thanks for your fast response!
>> Willy
>>
>>
>
> Sounds great, thank you both!
> Let me know if there are any issues.

There is a compiler warning after commit 1b6e75fa84 ("MEDIUM: haproxy-
systemd-wrapper: Use haproxy in same directory"):

src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c: In function ‘locate_haproxy’:
src/haproxy-systemd-wrapper.c:28:10: warning: ignoring return value of 
‘readlink’, declared with attribute warn_unused_result [-Wunused-result]


Can we silence the warning as per the diff attached?

If you agree, I will send a proper patch to Willy.



Thanks,

Lukas                                     

Attachment: silence-readlink.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to