On 9 December 2013 22:23, Chris Burroughs <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 05:02 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > >> To answer yes it is against 1.5 ... The caveats are the peers don't work >> and the session table and load balancing can get messed up due to the lack >> of shared information between processes but if you just need to utilise >> multiple stat sockets and the rest doesn't matter so much then it works >> nicely. >> > > But thesse are the same caveats that nbproc has always had, not new ones, > correct? > Correct - if nbrpoc was satisfactory before that does not alter that behaviour - just provides the additional separated stat sockets.
