On 28 мая 2014 г., at 13:06, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > > OK but then you make an interesting point with your very low timeout connect. > What about using the min of timeout connect and 1s then ? Thus you can simply > use your lower timeout connect as this new timeout. Would that be OK for you ? >
Sounds reasonable (provided we are talking only about redispatch to the same server, not to the other one).
