❦ 25 novembre 2014 16:46 +0100, Emeric Brun <eb...@haproxy.com> :
> Indeed on haproxy.com appliances, we made the choice to dedicate several > cores/CPUs for NICs interrupts (manual bind, no usage of irqbalance) and > to dedicate one other for the haproxy process with nbproc=1. On a related topic, did you get a chance to look at the new SO_INCOMING_CPU (which should land in 3.18)? From my understanding, this doesn't apply to HAProxy architecture since it assumes that incoming connections will be handed to workers. See: http://lwn.net/Articles/619862/ -- printk("Illegal format on cdrom. Pester manufacturer.\n"); 2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/fs/isofs/inode.c