On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:38 AM, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > Now that > compression works well, I think we could broaden the scope of status codes, > and explicitly allow 2xx except 204-206. From what I'm seeing, at least 200, > 201, 202, and 203 may contain a response subject to compression. > > Well, maybe we could at least allow 200-203 then. What do you think ?
I think that sounds very reasonable, thanks for the reply, Jesse
