On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 1:37 PM, Saurab t <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Willy, > > Thanks you for your kind response. > > Here are the information required :::: > > Haproxy version : > HA-Proxy version 1.5.8 2014/10/31 > Copyright 2000-2014 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> > > > > If this can help As you have already responded to two other scenarios : > > http://www.serverphorums.com/read.php?10,1075864 > > http://t55696.web-haproxy.webtalks.info/100-cpu-load-t55696.html > > how can we "exactly" trace if we have issue similar. > > ELSE : > > Attached is the haproxy config. Kindly guide us. Thanks a lot in advance. > > Even small suggestions are very much appreciated. > > Thanks & Regards > Saurab > > > > On 3/19/2015 12:33 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Hello, > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:04:54AM +0530, Saurabh Tiwari wrote: > > Hello, > > we are facing issue of haproxy consuming 100% CPU , we tried different > tunings on haproxy cfg . But only solution remains is of making the > nbproc > 1, which is not a permanent solution. > > _Pasting the common config section:_ > global > maxconn 280000 > nbproc 1 > user haproxy > group haproxy > chroot /var/lib/haproxy > stats socket /var/run/haproxy.sock > > defaults > mode http > balance roundrobin > > maxconn 275000 > timeout connect 5000 > timeout server 50000 > timeout client 50000 > > timeout http-keep-alive 5s > timeout http-request 15s > > retries 3 > option redispatch > option abortonclose > option tcp-smart-accept > option tcp-smart-connect > #option splice-auto > > listen stats self.prv:x0x0x > stats enable > stats uri / > > Your config is truncated, you only list the stats page, I guess you're > not running at 100% with a stats page only, so would you please post > your complete config (remove any password or sensitive info, hide IP > addresses if you wish). > > Please also give some information such as the request and/or connection > rate, traffic type (mostly SSL, etc). > > Kindly suggest, any solution possible. We need fix badly , do not wish > to migrate to nginx just for this reason. > > That doesn't make sense, if you switch from one product to another every > time you're facing a configuration problem, you can switch often! If you > need features that you only find in nginx, sure you'd rather switch, but > if the features you need are in haproxy, in general you should get better > performance here so switching will make the situation worse. > > Willy > >
You have not given any hints about your environment... I mean VM, hw, details on cpu/ram/nic, etc... Also, please remove this statement: option http-server-close replace by the two following ones: option http-keep-alive option prefer-last-server Baptiste
