> I was thinking of updating the ldap-check but I think I've a better idea. > Macros (well ish). > > send-binary 300c0201 # LDAP bind request "<ROOT>" simple > send-binary 01 # message ID > send-binary 6007 # protocol Op > send-binary 0201 # bind request > send-binary 03 # LDAP v3 > send-binary 04008000 # name, simple authentication > expect binary 0a0100 # bind response + result code: success > send-binary 30050201034200 # unbind request > > could be in a file named macros/ldap-simple-bind > > then the option > tcp-check-macro ldap-simple-bind > > would use it, I know this is close to includes. > > similarly macros/smtp-helo-quit > connect port 25 > expect rstring ^220 > send QUIT\r\n > expect rstring ^221 > > > or from > http://blog.haproxy.com/2014/06/06/binary-health-check-with-haproxy-1-5-php-fpmfastcgi-probe-example/ > # FCGI_BEGIN_REQUEST > send-binary 01 # version > send-binary 01 # FCGI_BEGIN_REQUEST > send-binary 0001 # request id > send-binary 0008 # content length > send-binary 00 # padding length > send-binary 00 # > send-binary 0001 # FCGI responder > send-binary 0000 # flags > send-binary 0000 # > send-binary 0000 # > # FCGI_PARAMS > send-binary 01 # version > send-binary 04 # FCGI_PARAMS > send-binary 0001 # request id > send-binary 0045 # content length > send-binary 03 # padding length: padding for content % 8 = 0 > send-binary 00 # > send-binary 0e03524551554553545f4d4554484f44474554 # REQUEST_METHOD = GET > send-binary 0b055343524950545f4e414d452f70696e67 # SCRIPT_NAME = /ping > send-binary 0f055343524950545f46494c454e414d452f70696e67 # SCRIPT_FILENAME > = /ping > send-binary 040455534552524F4F54 # USER = ROOT > send-binary 000000 # padding > # FCGI_PARAMS > send-binary 01 # version > send-binary 04 # FCGI_PARAMS > send-binary 0001 # request id > send-binary 0000 # content length > send-binary 00 # padding length: padding for content % 8 = 0 > send-binary 00 # > > expect binary 706f6e67 # pong > > (though for items like > send-binary 0e03524551554553545f4d4554484f44474554 # REQUEST_METHOD = GET > I'd prefer a > send-as-binary "REQUEST_METHOD = GET" > ) > > these and many others could be shipped with haproxy. > > this seems to make sense to me as they are small contained logical items > > Neil >
Hi Neil, Both contributions are interresting! Let's wait for other people feedback. Baptiste
