Hi,

The bug seems to be fixed, can you try the attached path ?

Thierry FOURNIER

On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 09:32:33 +0200
Thierry FOURNIER <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Thank you for the bug repport. I reproduce it, and it was a real bug.
> I look for this later.
> 
> Thierry
> 
> 
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:42:25 +0100
> Robert Samuel Newson <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I’m playing with the new set-path feature and encountered a bug. I’m using 
> > 1.6-dev1 plus all the patches up to Apr 22nd, I think we’re all clear that 
> > set-path was not working at all in 1.6-dev1 itself. It does now work but 
> > not in all situations I’d expect.
> > 
> > My config is below. I do nc -lk 8000 for the backend. For the first three 
> > cases, I see the right HTTP request printed there. For the fourth, nothing, 
> > and haproxy generates a 503. This is true if backend.map is empty (and thus 
> > the default "back" should be chosen, which does exist) or it can contain 
> > valid mappings to "back" and still returns 503 for requests with a matching 
> > Host header.
> > 
> > 
> > global
> >   nbproc 1
> > 
> > defaults
> >   mode http
> >   log global
> >   balance roundrobin
> >   option httplog
> >   option log-health-checks
> >   option log-separate-errors
> >   option forwardfor
> >   option redispatch
> >   retries 4
> >   option http-server-close
> >   timeout client 150s
> >   timeout server 1h
> >   timeout connect 5s
> >   timeout queue 5s
> > 
> > frontend front
> >   bind :9000
> > 
> >   # comment out as appropriate
> > 
> >   # case 1: works
> >   use_backend %[hdr(host),map(backend.map,back)]
> > 
> >   # case 2: works
> >   use_backend back
> > 
> >   # case 3: works
> >   http-request set-path /foo
> >   use_backend back
> > 
> >   # case 4: fails (503 response, no request sent to backend)
> >   # backend.map can be empty or contain a valid mapping
> >   http-request set-path /foo
> >   use_backend %[hdr(host),lower,map(backend.map,back)]
> > 
> > backend back
> >   server server1 127.0.0.1:8000 weight 10 check inter 7s
> > 
> > 
> 

Reply via email to