Many thanks!
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:50:35PM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote:
>> Ah, thanks - I hadn't thought about the case where connections were
>> queued up. In my tests, I had a very low queue timeout. The code you
>> suggested seems to do the trick. Updated patch below.
>
> Applied, thanks. I fixed a minor indent issue, please be careful next
> time :
>
> if (sv->maxconn == sv->minconn) { // static maxconn
> - sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v;
> + sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v;
> } else { // dynamic maxconn
> - sv->maxconn = v;
> + sv->maxconn = v;
> }
> Thanks,
> willy
>
--
- Andrew Hayworth
