Many thanks! On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 2:04 AM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 04:50:35PM -0500, Andrew Hayworth wrote: >> Ah, thanks - I hadn't thought about the case where connections were >> queued up. In my tests, I had a very low queue timeout. The code you >> suggested seems to do the trick. Updated patch below. > > Applied, thanks. I fixed a minor indent issue, please be careful next > time : > > if (sv->maxconn == sv->minconn) { // static maxconn > - sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v; > + sv->maxconn = sv->minconn = v; > } else { // dynamic maxconn > - sv->maxconn = v; > + sv->maxconn = v; > } > Thanks, > willy >
-- - Andrew Hayworth