Hmm...I haven't tuned anything (this is just my workstation, not a server).
/proc/sys/net/core/somaxconn 128
/proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_backlog doesn't exist

 /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_max_syn_backlog512

I guess those are pretty low for trying to thrash an echo server...any 
recommendations?

    On Thursday, 19 November 2015, 16:40, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote:
 

 Hi,

On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 03:37:33AM +0000, Thrawn wrote:
> OK, I've decided to go a bit easier on the stress tools ;), and limited
> concurrency to 500, using siege. That's resulted in some useful data
> (attached). 
> HAProxy HTTP endpoint, with 1 process, handled up to 500K total requests
> without breaking a sweat, in just under 30 seconds, achieving an actual
> concurrency of 160-170 (I'm guessing the requests finished too fast to go any
> higher). For some reason, the longest request took almost all that time;
> maybe that's again a limitation of the stress tool? Higher request volumes
> introduced a small percentage of timeouts.

Maybe you're hitting the accept backlog here.

> Increasing to two HAProxy processes made a marked difference. At 500K
> requests, total time halved to approximately 10-15 seconds. At higher
> volumes, timeouts were much rarer; I was able to run 5 tests at 1.5M requests
> each with no timeouts at all. Just for fun, I increased to 750 concurrency
> (2.25M requests), with no trouble (the same test with 1 proc resulted in 57
> timeouts and about 30% longer run time).

That also tends to confirm a backlog issue. What's your sys.net.core.somaxconn
and sys.net.ipv4.tcp_max_backlog ?

> PHP surprised me, actually; its performance characteristics were somewhat
> better than HAProxy with 1 process (though I don't know how the memory usage
> compared). However, compared to HAProxy with two processes, it had a somewhat
> higher error rate and noticeably slower response time.
> Looks like the conclusion is: use HAProxy, but tune nbproc wisely :)

Normally at 500k in 30s (16k/s) you clearly don't need to use nbproc, so
I'm pretty sure that you're hitting some network settings limits and your
system needs to be tuned now.

Willy



   

Reply via email to