Hi Baptiste,

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Baptiste <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 3:37 AM, Igor Cicimov
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 7:36 AM, Alex <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I was testing haproxy version 1.6.3 and I am a bit confused regarding
> >> draining a server.
> >>
> >> According to the documentation:
> >> set server <backend>/<server> state [ ready | drain | maint ]
> >> [...] Setting the mode to "drain" only removes the server from load
> >> balancing but still allows it to be checked and to accept new persistent
> >> connections.
> >>
> >> set weight <backend>/<server> <weight>[%]
> >> [...] A typical usage of this command is to disable a server during an
> >> update by setting its weight to zero, then to enable it again after the
> >> update by setting it back to 100%.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Well basically setting weight to 0 immediately disables the backend
>
> I disagree on this point. Your server will still receive requests with
> persistence.
> It is simply ejected from the load-balancing algorithm.
> Health checks are still performed.
>
>
If this is the case then there isn't any difference between drain and
disable in terms of maintenance. Setting the weight to 0 will still allow
the exiting sessions to go to the server and get disconnected when the
server restarts for update.

> whereas draining stops any new connections going to the backend but the
> existing
> > sessions are allowed to continue until some time limit is reached, lets
> say
> > 15 minutes, after which the backend gets completely disabled.
>
> Drain perform the same as above.
> I guess checks are also still performed.
>
> > It is kinda
> > removing the backend from the load balancer forcefully vs gracefully
> > (allowing the existing sessions to finish). What method to use is really
> up
> > to you and your user case.
> >
>
> I think you misunderstand "drain" and "disable". Disable forces
> everybody to get routed to an other server for their next request.
>
> Baptiste
>

Reply via email to