2016-02-10 8:17 GMT+01:00 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: > On Tue, Feb 09, 2016 at 06:10:01PM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > i'm currently testing 1.6.3 and request body logging. I'm wondering that > > logging of req body even works without setting "option > > http-buffer-request". Also "no option http-buffer-request" seems to have > no > > effect. > > > > > > Is this intended or have i missed something? > > you're playing with fire, it just happens to work by pure luck. When > you capture it you're lucky that the POST data were already there. The > purpose of the aforementionned option is to wait for the data before > proceeding. Try to connect using telnet and send your POST request by > hand, you'll see the difference between the two modes :-) > > You may also force your client to send "Expect:100-continue" before > sending the body, chances are that you'll never have the data in time. > > Willy >
Hi Willy, thanks for quick reply. Would it be more "safe" / less error-prone to warn the user if "req.body" is found in configuration without "option http-buffer-request" is set? (Or do not consider req.body at all in this case?) ------------- Best Regards Bjoern
