Thank you! I think you just made the case for me. =)
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:36:44PM -0400, CJ Ess wrote: > > I'm wanting to make a case for compiling haproxy against a modern version > > of pcre (supporting jit) when we roll out the next release to my day job. > > Anyone have some numbers handy that show the benefit of doing so? > > Please check these two commits, the first one links to a benchmark which > led to implement JIT, and the second one reports numbers with and without > pcre_study() : > > 7035132 ("MEDIUM: regex: Use PCRE JIT in acl") > de89871 ("MEDIUM: regex: Use pcre_study always when PCRE is used, > regardless of JIT") > > Willy > >
