Hello Hector - On 5 May 2016 at 12:11, Hector Rivas Gandara <[email protected]> wrote: > * If not, is there a better way to 'chain' the config as I did above.
I don't have any insight into the protocol layering problem you're having, I'm afraid, but if you do end up with the chained solution you describe, I have a suggestion. Take a look at the "abns@" syntax and feature documented here: https://cbonte.github.io/haproxy-dconv/configuration-1.6.html#bind. It's excellent for HAP->HAP links, as you're using. I'm using it in production *inside* Cloud Foundry, for the record :-) As an aside, I'd be interested in even a brief summary of how/if you resolved your problem, given that I've not seen it described on the list before. I wonder if you're the first to run into this specific problem ... All the best, Jonathan -- Jonathan Matthews London, UK http://www.jpluscplusm.com/contact.html
