Hi Aleks, On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 01:19:54PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Hi. > > Am 13-02-2017 12:15, schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 11:33:53AM +0100, Michael Hamburger wrote: > > > > Willy wrote: > [snipp] > > > > > Maybe you're interested in trying to implement the stuff above ? If > > > > so, just let me know, I can give you a few hints which could possibly > > > > help. > > > I would like to help but I need to find some free time for that. If > > > you can > > > spare some minutes I would love to get a few hints :) > > > > OK so the first thing is to keep the compatiblity with existing > > errorfiles > > because we don't want all users to have to rewrite theirs *as long as > > they > > are valid*. > > How about to reuse the config parser? > > For example a errorfile could look like. > > new: errorfile_301 > > ### > [header] > Location: http://... > > [body] > ... > ####
I must say I'm not sure I understood your proposal here :-) (...) > I'm sure there will be a request to add some variables to the 'templates'. Definitely, I gave a few examples of this recently, such as having req.hdr(host) reported in the contents. > Do you think it's worth to build a 'simple' template language or reuse an > already available one. I'd rather *not* implement a template language first until we know exactly what we need. And choosing an existing one before being sure about what we need is even worse! Cheers, Willy
